non-fiction

  • | |

    Straight from the Source: Jenny Lacika on Writing Historical Nonfiction

    What typically comes first for you: a character? An era? A story idea? How do you proceed from there?

    Often, I am interested in a certain topic and read until I find someone who catches my attention.

    My biography with Ashanti Fortson, Talking Books: Audiobook Inventor Dr. Robert B. Irwin and a New Way to Read, came about because of my interest in disability history. I am autistic and have multiple sclerosis, and my family has other disabilities, so it’s a topic that is important to me.

    I wasn’t sure what exactly I wanted to write about, so I started reading The Disability Rights Movement by Doris Zames Fleischer and Frieda Zames. There was one sentence on talking books, “…long playing (LP) records were used by blind people before they were used by the general public, for talking books preceded commercial LPs by fourteen years.” Audiobooks were super important to me as a child with strabismus, so I needed to know more.

    Eventually, I learned about Robert B. Irwin, who lost his sight as a child and went on to improve accessibility for blind Americans in numerous ways. Every new thing I learned about him made me more sure I needed to write about him. Sometimes the process is not so clear cut. Sometimes I need to read and read about a topic or person before I am convinced that I am really interested, and sometimes that never happens, so I was really excited about Robert’s story.

    How do you conduct your research?

    While reading through a source, I tend to collect additional sources. I love secondary sources, because they can lead me to primary sources I might not have found on my own. It branches out farther and farther while I collect interesting facts and think about the themes I want to emphasize. Sometimes I get so wrapped up in finding new sources that I lose sight of the goal, but I like to get as clear a picture as I can.

    For Talking Books, the process was interesting because it went from researching very broad ideas to learning about Robert. I was fortunate that there was a lot of documentation from the American Foundation for the Blind and news articles, but also from Robert himself and the people who worked closely with him. But Robert wrote about his own experiences and work in a way that felt a bit removed from it emotionally. This provided a challenge because I wanted readers to connect with him, so using the circumstances that blind students at the time were experiencing helped to bring the reader closer to Robert. So rather than telling the reader what he was feeling or thinking, they can read about how he was treated and then they can infer how that might have felt.

    At what point do you feel comfortable beginning to draft? How does your research continue once you begin writing?

    This has changed over time for me. Early in my writing, I would write long first drafts that were rambling and included everything I found interesting. I would then have to do more thinking about what I wanted the story to say, what I wanted readers to take away. Then I would need to do a lot more research to bring those ideas forward. Now, I tend to research until I see a strong takeaway, an idea to emphasize, then begin to draft. Now I usually take a few months to read about a subject before I try to draft and I do a lot more outlining than I did previously. I still need to refer back to the research as I draft, but usually I am referring back to information I am already familiar with and not looking for new information.

    What is your favorite thing about research?

    Learning new things! More specifically, I really love when I am researching a topic and find connections to other topics or people that I am even a little familiar with. I love learning how different histories connect and interact. While learning about Robert, I learned more about Helen Keller and her resistance to the talking books program. She thought that there were more pressing issues for the blind community. She eventually changed her mind and was instrumental in convincing President Roosevelt and Congress to fund a WPA project to create more talking book machines that not only allowed the program to expand to more readers, but employed workers with vision loss.

    What’s your least favorite thing about research?

    Finding really interesting facts that I have to cut from my book! For Talking Books, I learned that Robert paid for college by working as a door-to-door salesman, traveling on a tandem bike with his brother. They sold stereoscopes. He must have been an excellent salesman to sell a product he himself could not use! I am sure these skills helped him with everything he was able to achieve, but because it is a picture book, we wanted to get to his work on audiobooks more quickly, so we had to make some necessary cuts.

    Jenny Lacika is a picture book author from New Mexico. As a chronically ill Chicana and graduate of MIT, her work often explores themes relating to STEAM education, disability and accessibility, and Chicanx culture and history.

  • | |

    I am the teacher and the student.

    Research books in my closet library. Others live in my Kindle.

    Recently I taught a class about the research process. I thought it might be fun to share some of the things I covered.

    One of my favorite things about writing books that involve research is being both the teacher and the student. I pick my own subject. I decide what I want to learn.
    I determine how long and how deep and how wide I explore. Really, can it get any better? While I usually don’t know a lot of specifics about the eventual book that unfolds, I trust that the deeper I dig, the more questions I ask, the closer I’ll get to the eventual story.


    If you’ve read here any length of time you know I use a notebook for every story I write. They are part scrapbook, part research organizer, part writing practice, and part pep talk. When the book is done, they are documents that show how it all came together. I’ve run blog posts on each of my notebooks. You can see them all here.

    Every writer who also researches has a different process. Here’s my approach:

    I know I’m ready to begin writing when the information I’m learning becomes second nature. That doesn’t mean I don’t return to my research as I draft. Sometimes I need to dig deeper or must learn about something I didn’t cover earlier, but I’m most comfortable moving into the writing once I have a general sense of things. Research, like writing, is cyclical rather than linear. (At least that’s been my experience.)

    Everything I learn while researching is important to me, the writer. Most of what I learn, though, doesn’t end up in my stories. In order for a fact or detail to make it to the book, it needs to have a reason to be there. If a particular detail affects my character’s life or world, I’ll keep it. If it’s really interesting and fun and a wonderful nugget of information I love but doesn’t fit this requirement, I toss it. Sometimes those treasures find their way into an author’s note, but a lot of times they don’t.

    I think Mary Oliver’s instructions for living a life (from her poem “Sometimes”) perfectly describe the relationship between researching and writing:

    Pay attention.
    Be astonished.
    Tell about it.

    We can only be astonished if we first pay attention. What makes us curious? We should pick things to study that we find astonishing. What makes our heart sing? We should pay so much attention and be so astonished that we can’t help but tell others about it.

  • | | | | |

    Straight from the Source: Jess Rinker on Writing Historical Fiction and Nonfiction

    What typically comes first for you: a character? An era? A story idea? How do you proceed from there?

    All of the above (and more) has happened! Sometimes I feel like ideas find me, or any creative, as if they are floating around us all the time, and now and then one lands on our shoulder and won’t leave. I’ve had “voices” speak to me, settings or places I’m enamored with, what if questions that bug me for days, and even dreams evolve into full stories. For my picture book biographies, it was simply interest in learning about modern women trailblazers. For Out of Time, I knew I wanted to incorporate the Titanic simply because it’s an iconic and mysterious story that kids are generally attracted to. For The Dare Sisters, it was the setting—Ocracoke NC, and the actual pirate activity (namely Blackbeard!) that took place there.

    How do you conduct your research?

    I begin with Google like any self-respecting knowledge seeker. I wish I could say I sit at the library for days at a time and page through books and archives, and there was a time when I did do some of that, but now it’s all virtually online. Once I am set on a story, I will then find books and either take them out of the library or buy them for a deeper dive and connection, and I will visit as many places as I can that are related to the character or topic, but the internet is such a gift, and such a great place to start for any project—historical or pure fiction.

    What kinds of sources do you use?

    Everything I find—books, websites, videos, interviews—especially personal face-to-face interviews—photographs, visiting a place or a museum or gallery that pertains to the topic. In the YA I’m working on right now, which is not historical fiction but deeply rooted in cognitive and dream psychology, I use a lot of scientific and medical journals (such as NIH) for studies that relate to the issues I’m writing about.

    How long do you typically research before beginning to draft?

    Until I feel like it’s time to get words down. I definitely don’t have a set time for any project, and research always continues as I write, but generally I’ll research until I just know it’s time to start something. I can feel the pull of needing to get my own words down, and am receptive to it otherwise one could research forever.

    What is your favorite thing about research?

    I’m an insatiably curious person so research helps to quench that. It also brings a story to life, makes the characters feel more real, and often comes with little surprise discoveries that can make the writing process even more fun.

    What’s your least favorite thing about research?

    Conflicting information. When writing Gloria Takes a Stand, I was the most anxious about this because it’s not fiction, it’s historical and a biography, and I was so afraid of quoting incorrectly or misinterpreting facts. I even found inconsistencies with when laws were passed versus introduced, versus put into action, so it required a lot of digging to be sure I was doing my due diligence to represent everything accurately. I was also put through a few intense fact-checking rounds by my publisher, which while tedious at times, I was grateful for.
    

    What’s your favorite thing about writing historical fiction?


    There is some validation, or reward maybe, when you’re able to weave true truths into fictional truths. When history aligns with your intended plot—that is the best! For example, with The Dare Sisters, which is set in the 90’s (I can’t believe that’s considered historical, but it is), I wanted to include a certain event that involved Blackbeard’s ship, and the date it was discovered lined up so perfectly with the story I wanted to tell, I was beyond thrilled. It feels like a little victory.

    What are some obstacles writing historical fiction brings?

    In the same way history can align with your plot, it can also do the complete opposite. Then you have to do some reconsideration of your plot or the fact/event/figure you want to use—it can be a complicated puzzle.

    What’s one of the most interesting things you’ve learned while researching?

    Learning about firefighter Brenda Berkman for Send a Girl! was one of the most eye-opening experiences. I worked with Brenda when writing that book so I got first-hand accounts of everything. It was sobering because a lot of the work she has done played out over the course of my childhood—so while I was busy climbing trees and catching frogs, she was busy fighting the patriarchy in the form of the FDNY. It makes me very grateful for activists like her.


    Jess Rinker is a writer for ages 4 to 104. While much of her success has come by way of children’s books, she’s also published poetry, creative nonfiction, travel articles, theatre reviews, essays and short stories. Her titles for young readers include picture book biographies, chapter books and middle grade novels and she’s currently working on what she hopes will be her debut young adult. She lives in the Mountain State with her beloved, Joe McGee, also a children’s author and writer of all things.

    Happy Holidays, all. I’ll see you in the new year!